The 10 Biggest Source Material Betrayals In Movies, According To Reddit


Death threatwhich is based on what is considered one of the greatest anime shows ever made, is getting a sequel, and the writer says Death Note 2 will draw more from the source material. Since the series is so beloved, fans were disappointed when the film adaptation was unfaithful to the show, but the writer listened to the critics and will right that wrong with the sequel.

It’s a decision that Redditors want many other studios to take note of, because so many movies betray the source material, and they usually end up bombing at the box office, getting flack, and upsetting fans of the properties. Whether based on comics, novels, or video games, the writers of these films should have dug deep into the source material.


Birds of Prey (2020)

Harley Quinn in Birds of Prey

Birds of prey is actually one of the highest-rated DCEU movies on Rotten Tomatoes, as critics enjoyed the film far more than the usual DC release. But maybe that’s because they weren’t as aware of the source material, as the movie wasn’t received as well by fans. Professional-Rip-519 rhetorically asks, “Did the filmmakers even read one of the comics because the movie and the comics are in no way similar except for the character names?”

RELATED: 10 Ways Birds Of Prey Is The Best DCEU Movie

The film’s anti-hero team includes Renee Montoya and Cassandra, and while they’re DC comic book characters, they have nothing to do with Birds of Prey. The only actual comic book members in the film are Huntress and Black Canary, and they’re the two least explored characters.

World War Z (2013)

Hirasmas argues that World War Z is not faithful to the book on which it is based, arguing, “The World War Z the film has absolutely nothing to do with the novel. The movie is just a zombie action movie telling the story of Brad Pitt.” The movie, while entertaining, is a stereotypical, linear story with a protagonist trying to survive a zombie outbreak.

The novel is much more interesting and more like an anthology of several different stories about many characters’ personal accounts of the disaster. However, a film like that would have been much harder to market, although it could have been much better with an ensemble cast. As David Fincher almost realized World War Z 2it probably would have been more faithful to the source material, and it’s a shame it’s stuck in development hell.

The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (2003)

Rodney Skinner drinking Scotch - The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen

Redditor Thcidiot points to the 2003 film The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen as the adaptation that deviates the most from the source material. The film is based on the comic book of the same name written by Alan Moore which brings together several public domain characters with supernatural abilities.

The Redditor expresses: “I absolutely loved this movie. Many years later I read the comics and it was a night and day difference. Now I want an R-rated League of Extraordinary Gentlemen.” The graphic novel is extremely dark, and it’s much closer to watchmen than he is for any family superhero team-up movie, which the film adaptation tries to be. The 2003 release of the material was so disappointing that it even caused Sean Connery to retire.

X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009)

Deadpool in X-Men Origins Wolverine

DVDJunky user refers to X-Men Origins: Wolverine as one of the biggest mistakes 20th Century Fox has ever made, noting, “I’m just glad Ryan Reynolds got to keep making standalone movies.” The Redditor refers to how Deadpool’s mouth was sewn up in the movie, so he couldn’t do any of his rude and vulgar one-liners, which is exactly what the Merc with the Mouth is for known in the comics. .

RELATED: 10 Things About Wolverine From Movies People Often Confuse With Canon Comics

But while no studio exec or actor involved would want to call attention to the franchise’s biggest mistake, the new dead Pool The series references and hilariously ridicules the decision to shut Wade’s mouth. And both dead Pool movies overall more than redeemed the x-men series for how he ruined the character in Origins. Now, instead of fans being mad at the movie like they were in 2009, they’re laughing at the movie, and it’s actually fun to watch because of it.

The Dark Tower (2017)

Based on a series of novels written by Steven King, The dark tower Should have been a Western fantasy epic and the start of a long film franchise, but it ended up being completely wasted potential. BrokenPedley is particularly heartbroken by the way the 2017 film deviated from the source material.

The editor notes: “The dark tower the film is a shipwreck compared to the book, they have very, very little rights, if any at all. The casting was good, the story was really different in the worst way. The 2017 release took so many liberties with the source material that the film angered people. from there.

I Am Legend (2007)

i am the legend of will smith neville recording

It seems like Hollywood obviously has a hard time adapting zombie/vampire apocalypse novels faithfully. Either that or the studios are just using the name of the property to help market the type of movie they want. Poorloko apparently thinks it’s the latter, complaining that I’m a legend ruin the book.

The Redditor explains, “Why did they keep the title if they were intentionally going to miss the point?” The user refers to the fact that the book tells how the vampires got scared of Robert Neville, the last man on Earth. He became a legend like vampires were to humans. But the film neglects all that subtext in favor of a mediocre action flick.

Super Mario Bros. (1993)

John Leguizamo and Bob Hoskins in Super Mario Bros.

Super Mario Bros. is known for being the very first major video game movie, and the genre has seemingly never been able to recover since. This user comments on how different the dark film is from the colorful and vibrant video game. But, oddly enough, the Redditor doesn’t think disrespecting the source material is a bad thing.

The user shared, “Love this movie. Just a weird fever dream. Absolutely nothing to do with mario just borrowed the names of things.” Oddly, the film has more in common with blade runner and Total recall than it does with the source material, especially since the strippers and sexual content were in the original cut. But against all odds, the film has become cult.

The Shining (1980)

Jack Nicholson as Jack Torrence in Stanley Kubrick's adaptation of The Shining.

Betraying the source material is usually a big no-no and usually results in poor reviews and poor box office performance. However, the brilliant is one of the best examples of the filmmaker deviating from working source material. Tbrou16 explains that the film is completely different from the novel, but adds: “But it went well obviously.”

RELATED: The 10 Biggest Mistakes The Characters Make In Every Haunted House Movie

The 1980 horror is more of a Stanley Kubrick movie than a Stephen King movie, and maybe that’s why the author hates the movie. But as great as Kubrick’s film is, it would still be great to see a proper adaptation of the source material, and fans of the book definitely felt overwhelmed when they first saw it in 1980.

Uncharted (2022)

Tom Holland in Uncharted

Redditor LuinChance accuses the new Unexplored to betray its source material. The Redditor hilariously blames studio executives, posting, “Sony’s studio executives are absolute maniacal idiots.” In all fairness, the development of the film was all over the place and was stuck in development hell for years with seven different directors attached to the project. It is therefore not surprising that the result is sloppy and welded.

Unexplored draws from all four video games in the series to create a bizarre greatest hits-like movie. The movie features all of the most important sequences and levels from the games, but that doesn’t make sense considering they’re all set in different periods of Drake’s life. And that makes even less sense given that Drake in the movie is much younger than he is in the games, which was another fan criticism.

Drive (2011)

Ryan Gosling in Drive

Many fans may not know this Conduct is based on a novel, as the film takes full advantage of its format. Between the sweeping synthwave, slick cinematography, and light-hearted dialogue narrative, it doesn’t quite feel like it was born out of a novel. But that’s because, as BobGoddamnSaget explains, the film is completely different from the source material.

The Redditor comments, “Standard and Driver have a long-standing friendship and there’s no hint of romance between Driver and Irene. Irene (Irina in the novel) actually about two-thirds dies.” In the film, Irene and Driver’s relationship is so prominent that Conduct could easily be called a romance.

NEXT: The 10 Best Style Over Substance Movies, According To Reddit

Henry Cavill back for Mission Impossible in esteem

Henry Cavill is definitely coming back to Mission: Impossible 8 now, isn’t he?

About the Author


Comments are closed.